🐾 claw-stack
Architecture Module Powered by Multi-Agent Consensus Protocol Plugin

Collaborative Decision Engine

Your AI team debates before it acts.

Before executing a critical task, agents debate the best approach. This "Mix of Experts" review process significantly reduces errors and hallucinations compared to single-agent execution.

Single AI = single point of failure. One hallucination and your report is wrong, your email goes out wrong, your code ships broken.

Live Demo

Watch Your AI Team Deliberate

Multiple specialized agents debate in real time β€” then reach a consensus decision.

Multi-Agent Consensus Protocol Β· In Progress
4 agents

πŸ“‹ Topic: "Should we launch the new pricing page next week?"

Why It Matters

Single AI vs. Agent Team

The difference between a single agent guessing and a team of experts agreeing.

Without Multi-Agent Consensus Protocol
βœ—

One AI answers β†’ ships immediately

βœ—

Single point of hallucination

βœ—

No record of reasoning

With Multi-Agent Consensus Protocol
βœ“

Multiple AIs debate β†’ best answer wins

βœ“

Peer review catches errors before execution

βœ“

Auto-generated meeting minutes

Use Cases

Built for High-Stakes Decisions

Any decision that matters too much to leave to a single AI.

πŸ’Ό Strategy

Executive Decisions

Architecture decision, deployment strategy, resource allocation β€” bring multiple AI perspectives to the table before committing.

πŸš€ Go/No-Go

Product Launches

Risk assessment, go/no-go decisions with evidence from research, engineering, and market analysis agents all in one debate.

πŸ’° Audit

Financial Reviews

Multi-agent audit before reports go out. Every number checked, every assumption challenged β€” automatically.

πŸ—οΈ Engineering

Architecture Choices

Tech stack debates with specialized engineering agents. Get consensus before a single line of code is written.

Under the Hood

How the Debate Works

Each agent brings its own expertise. A coordinator orchestrates the discussion, compresses history to keep costs low, and detects consensus β€” so meetings stay sharp no matter how complex the topic.

1. Topic broadcast Coordinator sends the question to all specialist agents simultaneously
2. Expert responses Each agent contributes from its domain β€” research, risk, engineering, and more
3. Stance detection AGREE / DISAGREE / NEUTRAL parsed deterministically β€” no hallucinated consensus
4. Early exit If all agree, the meeting closes immediately and minutes are written
5. Auto minutes Full transcript, summaries, and final verdict saved to Markdown automatically
O(1)
Token cost per round
3
Stance types: AGREE / DISAGREE / NEUTRAL
Auto
Early exit on consensus
1 cmd
To start any meeting